Comparison

K-Vreau din Romania Rulada cu carne de porc vs Premium Ceafa crud uscata, feliata

Overall, Premium Ceafa crud uscata, feliata has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientK-Vreau din Romania Rulada c...Premium Ceafa crud uscata, f...
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 293 kcal 253 kcal
Fat 25 g 18 g
Saturated fat 7 g 7 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0 g
Salt 3 g 4.6 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 17 g 22 g
Additives12
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Premium Ceafa crud uscata, feliata has 14% fewer calories (253 kcal vs 293 kcal).
  • Premium Ceafa crud uscata, feliata has 28% less fat (18 g vs 25 g).
  • Premium Ceafa crud uscata, feliata has no sugar, while K-Vreau din Romania Rulada cu carne de porc has 0.5 g.
  • K-Vreau din Romania Rulada cu carne de porc has 35% less salt (3 g vs 4.6 g).
  • Premium Ceafa crud uscata, feliata has 23% more protein (22 g vs 17 g).

Ingredients

K-Vreau din Romania Rulada cu carne de porc

cotlet de porc 55%, piept de porc 42%, sare, condimente (usturoi, piper, cimbru, rozmarin, coriandru), conservant (nitrit de sodiu).

Premium Ceafa crud uscata, feliata

Ceafa de porc, sare, zahar, condimente (ienibahar, piper, coriandru, dafin), antioxidant (ascorbat de sodiu), conservant (nitrit de sodiu).

FAQ

Which is healthier: K-Vreau din Romania Rulada cu carne de porc or Premium Ceafa crud uscata, feliata?

Overall, Premium Ceafa crud uscata, feliata has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Premium Ceafa crud uscata, feliata has fewer calories: 253 kcal versus 293 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Premium Ceafa crud uscata, feliata has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons