Comparison

Just un délice mini à la noix de jambon vs Noix de jambon

Overall, Noix de jambon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientJust un délice mini à la noi...Noix de jambon
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 348 kcal 204 kcal
Fat 20 g 8 g
Saturated fat 8 g 2.4 g
Sugars 2.8 g 0.6 g
Salt 5.8 g 5 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 38 g 32 g
Additives40
AllergensMilk, NutsNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Noix de jambon has 41% fewer calories (204 kcal vs 348 kcal).
  • Noix de jambon has 60% less fat (8 g vs 20 g).
  • Noix de jambon has 70% less saturated fat (2.4 g vs 8 g).
  • Noix de jambon has 79% less sugar (0.6 g vs 2.8 g).
  • Noix de jambon has 14% less salt (5 g vs 5.8 g).
  • Just un délice mini à la noix de jambon has 16% more protein (38 g vs 32 g).
  • Only Just un délice mini à la noix de jambon lists: Milk, Nuts.

Ingredients

Just un délice mini à la noix de jambon

Viande de porc (75% de noix de jambon) (origine UE), sel, LACTOSE, oligofructose, dextrose, épices et plante aromatique, sucre, arôme naturel, conservateurs : nitrate de potassium et nitrite de sodium, ferments, Enveloppe : alginate de sodium, cellulose ou collagène, cellulose, # 200 g de viande utilisés pour la préparation de 100 g de produit fini, # Présence possible de fruits à coques et de protéines de lait,

Noix de jambon

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Just un délice mini à la noix de jambon or Noix de jambon?

Overall, Noix de jambon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Noix de jambon has fewer calories: 204 kcal versus 348 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Noix de jambon has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 2.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons