Jimmys iced coffee mocha vs Iced Coffee Viennese Style
Overall, Jimmys iced coffee mocha has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Jimmys iced coffee mocha | Iced Coffee Viennese Style |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 46 kcal | 54 kcal |
| Fat | 1.2 g | 1.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.8 g | 1.1 g |
| Sugars | 6.1 g | 7.8 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 2.3 g | 1.7 g |
| Additives | 2 | 1 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk, Vollmilch |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Jimmys iced coffee mocha has 15% fewer calories (46 kcal vs 54 kcal).
- Jimmys iced coffee mocha has 33% less fat (1.2 g vs 1.8 g).
- Jimmys iced coffee mocha has 27% less saturated fat (0.8 g vs 1.1 g).
- Jimmys iced coffee mocha has 22% less sugar (6.1 g vs 7.8 g).
- Jimmys iced coffee mocha has 26% more protein (2.3 g vs 1.7 g).
- Jimmys iced coffee mocha has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Iced Coffee Viennese Style lists: Vollmilch.
Ingredients
Jimmys iced coffee mocha
Semi-skimmed _Milk_ (60%), Arabica coffee (water, coffee) (36%), unrefined demerara sugar, chocolate powder, low fat cocoa powder, acidity regulator (sodium carbonate), vanilla flavouring
Iced Coffee Viennese Style
Vollmilch 51%, Wasser, Zucker, Karamellzucker, Kaffee-Extrakt 0,3%, Aroma, Salz unjodiert, Stabilisator: Carrageen
FAQ
Which is healthier: Jimmys iced coffee mocha or Iced Coffee Viennese Style?
Overall, Jimmys iced coffee mocha has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Jimmys iced coffee mocha has fewer calories: 46 kcal versus 54 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Jimmys iced coffee mocha has less sugar: 6.1 g versus 7.8 g per 100 g.