Jimmys iced coffee mocha vs Hell cappuccino
Overall, Jimmys iced coffee mocha has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Jimmys iced coffee mocha | Hell cappuccino |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 46 kcal | 56 kcal |
| Fat | 1.2 g | 0.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.8 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 6.1 g | 9.1 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 2.3 g | 2.6 g |
| Additives | 2 | 3 |
| Allergens | Milk | Gluten, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Jimmys iced coffee mocha has 18% fewer calories (46 kcal vs 56 kcal).
- Hell cappuccino has 33% less fat (0.8 g vs 1.2 g).
- Hell cappuccino has 38% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 0.8 g).
- Jimmys iced coffee mocha has 33% less sugar (6.1 g vs 9.1 g).
- Hell cappuccino has 12% more protein (2.6 g vs 2.3 g).
- Jimmys iced coffee mocha has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Hell cappuccino lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Jimmys iced coffee mocha
Semi-skimmed _Milk_ (60%), Arabica coffee (water, coffee) (36%), unrefined demerara sugar, chocolate powder, low fat cocoa powder, acidity regulator (sodium carbonate), vanilla flavouring
Hell cappuccino
Пастьоризирано мляко (75%), вода, захар, екстракт от кафе (1,2%), карамелизиран захарен сироп, модифицирано нишесте (хидроксипропил динишестен фосфат), ароматизант, регулатор на киселинност (натриев хидроксид), кофейн.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Jimmys iced coffee mocha or Hell cappuccino?
Overall, Jimmys iced coffee mocha has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Jimmys iced coffee mocha has fewer calories: 46 kcal versus 56 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Jimmys iced coffee mocha has less sugar: 6.1 g versus 9.1 g per 100 g.