Ice Coffee Double Espresso vs Iced Coffee Viennese Style
Overall, Ice Coffee Double Espresso has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Ice Coffee Double Espresso
Iced Coffee Viennese Style
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Ice Coffee Double Espresso | Iced Coffee Viennese Style |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 49 kcal | 54 kcal |
| Fat | 0.8 g | 1.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 1.1 g |
| Sugars | 7.2 g | 7.8 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 2.7 g | 1.7 g |
| Additives | 2 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk, Vollmilch |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ice Coffee Double Espresso has 56% less fat (0.8 g vs 1.8 g).
- Ice Coffee Double Espresso has 55% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 1.1 g).
- Ice Coffee Double Espresso has 37% more protein (2.7 g vs 1.7 g).
- Ice Coffee Double Espresso has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Iced Coffee Viennese Style lists: Milk, Vollmilch.
Ingredients
Ice Coffee Double Espresso
Пастьоризирано мляко с 1% масленост (75%), вода, захар, екстракт от кафе (1,6), овкусяване с кофеин, модифицирано нишесте (хидроксипропил динишесте фосфат), карамелизиран захарен сироп, кофеин, регулатор на киселинностт (натриев хидроксид).
Iced Coffee Viennese Style
Vollmilch 51%, Wasser, Zucker, Karamellzucker, Kaffee-Extrakt 0,3%, Aroma, Salz unjodiert, Stabilisator: Carrageen
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ice Coffee Double Espresso or Iced Coffee Viennese Style?
Overall, Ice Coffee Double Espresso has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ice Coffee Double Espresso has fewer calories: 49 kcal versus 54 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ice Coffee Double Espresso has less sugar: 7.2 g versus 7.8 g per 100 g.