Comparison

Jimmy’s Iced Coffee High Protein vs Ice Coffee Double Espresso

Overall, Jimmy’s Iced Coffee High Protein has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientJimmy’s Iced Coffee High Pro...Ice Coffee Double Espresso
Nutri-Score b c
NOVA group 1 4
Calories 54 kcal 49 kcal
Fat 1 g 0.8 g
Saturated fat 0.7 g 0.5 g
Sugars 5.6 g 7.2 g
Salt 0.2 g 0 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 5.6 g 2.7 g
Additives22
AllergensMilkNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Jimmy’s Iced Coffee High Protein has 22% less sugar (5.6 g vs 7.2 g).
  • Jimmy’s Iced Coffee High Protein has 52% more protein (5.6 g vs 2.7 g).
  • Jimmy’s Iced Coffee High Protein has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Jimmy’s Iced Coffee High Protein is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Jimmy’s Iced Coffee High Protein lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Jimmy’s Iced Coffee High Protein

0.1% fat protein enriched Milk (56%), whole Milk, single-origin Arabic coffee (water, coffee*)(18%), unrefined demerar sugar, acidity regulator (sodium bicarbonate). *Rainforest Alliance Certified

Ice Coffee Double Espresso

Пастьоризирано мляко с 1% масленост (75%), вода, захар, екстракт от кафе (1,6), овкусяване с кофеин, модифицирано нишесте (хидроксипропил динишесте фосфат), карамелизиран захарен сироп, кофеин, регулатор на киселинностт (натриев хидроксид).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Jimmy’s Iced Coffee High Protein or Ice Coffee Double Espresso?

Overall, Jimmy’s Iced Coffee High Protein has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Ice Coffee Double Espresso has fewer calories: 49 kcal versus 54 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Jimmy’s Iced Coffee High Protein has less sugar: 5.6 g versus 7.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons