Comparison
Iodized Table Salt vs Salz
Overall, Salz has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Iodized Table Salt | Salz |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 2 | 2 |
| Calories | 8 kcal | 0 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 93.9 g | 99.9 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 2 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Salz has no calories, while Iodized Table Salt has 8 kcal.
- Salz has no sugar, while Iodized Table Salt has 2 g.
Ingredients
Iodized Table Salt
Salt, Calcium silicate, Sugar, Potassium iodide
Salz
Siedesalz, Kaliumfluorid, Folsäure, Kaliumjodat, Trennmittel Natriumferrocyanid.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Iodized Table Salt or Salz?
Overall, Salz has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Salz has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 8 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Salz has less sugar: 0 g versus 2 g per 100 g.