Iodized Table Salt vs Lo Salt
Overall, Lo Salt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Iodized Table Salt | Lo Salt |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 2 | 2 |
| Calories | 8 kcal | 0 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 93.9 g | 33.3 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Lo Salt has no calories, while Iodized Table Salt has 8 kcal.
- Lo Salt has no sugar, while Iodized Table Salt has 2 g.
- Lo Salt has 65% less salt (33.3 g vs 93.9 g).
Ingredients
Iodized Table Salt
Salt, Calcium silicate, Sugar, Potassium iodide
Lo Salt
potassium chloride (66% min), sodium chloride (33.3% of max), anti-caking agents (magnesium carbonate and salts of hexacyanoferrate)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Iodized Table Salt or Lo Salt?
Overall, Lo Salt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Lo Salt has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 8 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Lo Salt has less sugar: 0 g versus 2 g per 100 g.