Comparison

Inspired to Cook Beef Stock vs Bouillon de viande

Overall, Inspired to Cook Beef Stock has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientInspired to Cook Beef StockBouillon de viande
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 8 kcal 302 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 23 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 15 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0.6 g
Salt 0.6 g 46 g
Fiber 0.5 g —
Protein 1.2 g 13 g
Additives03
AllergensBeef, GlutenNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Inspired to Cook Beef Stock has 97% fewer calories (8 kcal vs 302 kcal).
  • Inspired to Cook Beef Stock has 98% less fat (0.5 g vs 23 g).
  • Inspired to Cook Beef Stock has 99% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 15 g).
  • Inspired to Cook Beef Stock has 99% less salt (0.6 g vs 46 g).
  • Bouillon de viande has 91% more protein (13 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Inspired to Cook Beef Stock is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Inspired to Cook Beef Stock lists: Beef, Gluten.

Ingredients

Inspired to Cook Beef Stock

Water, Beef Bones, Beef (1.3%), Tomato Paste, Salt, Barley Malt Extract, Beef Fat, Sugar, Onion, Carrot, Cornflour, Mushroom Concentrate, Onion Purée, Red Wine Concentrate, Black Pepper <1%

Bouillon de viande

Zout, palmvet, aroma, smaakversterkers (E621, E631, E627), zetmeel, volledig gehard palmvet, rundvleespoeder, ui, karamelstroop, peterselie, wortel, gistextract, peterseliewortelpoeder

FAQ

Which is healthier: Inspired to Cook Beef Stock or Bouillon de viande?

Overall, Inspired to Cook Beef Stock has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Inspired to Cook Beef Stock has fewer calories: 8 kcal versus 302 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Inspired to Cook Beef Stock has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons