Comparison
IGP Riz de Camargue vs Riz Thai
Overall, Riz Thai has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | IGP Riz de Camargue | Riz Thai |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 353 kcal | 353 kcal |
| Fat | 1.4 g | 0.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 3 g | 0.9 g |
| Protein | 6.5 g | 8.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Riz Thai has 43% less fat (0.8 g vs 1.4 g).
- IGP Riz de Camargue has 70% more fiber (3 g vs 0.9 g).
- Riz Thai has 20% more protein (8.1 g vs 6.5 g).
Ingredients
IGP Riz de Camargue
IGP Riz de Camargue long grain étuvé de qualité supérieure.
Riz Thai
Riz long
FAQ
Which is healthier: IGP Riz de Camargue or Riz Thai?
Overall, Riz Thai has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
IGP Riz de Camargue has fewer calories: 353 kcal versus 353 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
IGP Riz de Camargue has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.2 g per 100 g.