Comparison

Iglo Field Fresh Spruitjes Met Spek vs Choux de Bruxelles

Overall, Choux de Bruxelles has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientIglo Field Fresh Spruitjes M...Choux de Bruxelles
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 89 kcal 43 kcal
Fat 6.8 g 0.5 g
Saturated fat 3.2 g 0.1 g
Sugars 3.1 g 2.9 g
Salt 0.5 g 0 g
Fiber 0.5 g 4.3 g
Protein 3.4 g 4 g
Additives10
AllergensGluten, MilkNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Choux de Bruxelles has 52% fewer calories (43 kcal vs 89 kcal).
  • Choux de Bruxelles has 93% less fat (0.5 g vs 6.8 g).
  • Choux de Bruxelles has 97% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 3.2 g).
  • Choux de Bruxelles has 96% less salt (0 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Choux de Bruxelles has 88% more fiber (4.3 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Choux de Bruxelles has 15% more protein (4 g vs 3.4 g).
  • Only Iglo Field Fresh Spruitjes Met Spek lists: Gluten, Milk.

Ingredients

Iglo Field Fresh Spruitjes Met Spek

Choux de Bruxelles 80%, oignons frits (oignons, huile de colza), beurre (lait), bacon 3,5% (viande de porc, sel, sucre, épices, conservateur: extrait de romarin, fumée), persil, bouillon de légumes (sel, dextrose, levure, oignon, poireau, échalote, paprika, tomate), huile d'olive, eau, pâte d'ail (ail, sel), vin blanc en poudre (maltodextrine (gluten), extrait de vin blanc), sel, épices.

Choux de Bruxelles

Der Rosenkohl

FAQ

Which is healthier: Iglo Field Fresh Spruitjes Met Spek or Choux de Bruxelles?

Overall, Choux de Bruxelles has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Choux de Bruxelles has fewer calories: 43 kcal versus 89 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Choux de Bruxelles has less sugar: 2.9 g versus 3.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons