Huvudroll vs Fiambre de pá
Overall, Fiambre de pá has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Huvudroll | Fiambre de pá |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 186 kcal | 101 kcal |
| Fat | 13 g | 3.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.2 g | 2.2 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 0.6 g |
| Salt | 1.5 g | 4.7 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 13 g | 16 g |
| Additives | 0 | 6 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fiambre de pá has 46% fewer calories (101 kcal vs 186 kcal).
- Fiambre de pá has 73% less fat (3.5 g vs 13 g).
- Fiambre de pá has 31% less saturated fat (2.2 g vs 3.2 g).
- Huvudroll has 68% less salt (1.5 g vs 4.7 g).
- Fiambre de pá has 19% more protein (16 g vs 13 g).
- Huvudroll is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Huvudroll
Viande de poulet hâchée, eau, oignons, peau de poulet, oignon frits (oignons, huile de colza), amidon de pomme de terre, sel, poudre d'oignon, poivre blanc, gingembre en poudre, piment de jamaique
Fiambre de pá
80% paleta de cerdo, agua, sal, emulgentes: trifosfatos, monogliceridos y digliceridos de acidos grasos; estabilizante: cloruro potásico; correctores de acidez: acetatos de sodio, ácido málico; maltodextrina, dextrosa, fibras vegetales (quisante, citricos, patata), gelificantes: algas tucheuma transformadas, honiac; antioxidante: ascorbato sódico; hemoglobina, conservador: nitrito
FAQ
Which is healthier: Huvudroll or Fiambre de pá?
Overall, Fiambre de pá has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fiambre de pá has fewer calories: 101 kcal versus 186 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Huvudroll has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.