Huvudroll vs Boulettes de viande cuites recette suédoise
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Huvudroll | Boulettes de viande cuites r... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 254 kcal | 243 kcal |
| Fat | 20 g | 17 g |
| Saturated fat | 8.5 g | 6.7 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 0.8 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 1.3 g |
| Fiber | 1 g | 0.2 g |
| Protein | 14 g | 14 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Gluten, Eiweißpulver, Weizenmehl | Eggs, Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Boulettes de viande cuites recette suédoise has 15% less fat (17 g vs 20 g).
- Boulettes de viande cuites recette suédoise has 21% less saturated fat (6.7 g vs 8.5 g).
- Huvudroll has 96% less salt (0.1 g vs 1.3 g).
- Huvudroll has 80% more fiber (1 g vs 0.2 g).
- Only Huvudroll lists: Eiweißpulver, Weizenmehl.
Ingredients
Huvudroll
Nötkött (51 %), griskött (25%), vatten, ströbröd (vetemjöl, vatten, salt, jäst), ägg, torkad lök, salt, lök, äggvitepulver, svartpepparextrakt, kryddpeppar.
Boulettes de viande cuites recette suédoise
Viande bovine (origine : France) 33,2%, viande de porc (origine : Allemagne) 30,5%, eau, chapelure [farine de _blé_(_gluten_), sel, levure], oignon, préparation à base d'_œuf_ liquide pasteurisé (blanc d’_œuf_ liquide, _œuf_ entier liquide, sel), gras de porc, amidon de pomme de terre, sel, poivre, extrait de poivre.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Huvudroll or Boulettes de viande cuites recette suédoise?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Boulettes de viande cuites recette suédoise has fewer calories: 243 kcal versus 254 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Huvudroll has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 0.8 g per 100 g.