Comparison

Hot chocolatta white vs Organic hot chocolate

Overall, Organic hot chocolate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientHot chocolatta whiteOrganic hot chocolate
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 389 kcal 384 kcal
Fat 3.2 g 6.6 g
Saturated fat 3.1 g 4.2 g
Sugars 71 g 61 g
Salt 0.6 g 0 g
Fiber 0 g 11 g
Protein 8.1 g 8.7 g
Additives01
AllergensGluten, MilkNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Hot chocolatta white has 52% less fat (3.2 g vs 6.6 g).
  • Hot chocolatta white has 26% less saturated fat (3.1 g vs 4.2 g).
  • Organic hot chocolate has 14% less sugar (61 g vs 71 g).
  • Organic hot chocolate has 95% less salt (0 g vs 0.6 g).
  • Organic hot chocolate has 100% more fiber (11 g vs 0 g).
  • Organic hot chocolate is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Hot chocolatta white lists: Gluten, Milk.

Ingredients

Hot chocolatta white

Захар, обезмаслено мляко на прах (22%), суроватка на прах, глюкозен сироп, напълно хидрогенирана кокосова мазнина, нишесте, ароматизанти, оцветител: каротени, стабилизатор:калиев фосфат

Organic hot chocolate

May Contain Milk. Icing Sugar # (Sugar #, Tapioca Starch #), Fat-Reduced Cocoa Powder # (31 %) (Fat-Reduced Cocoa Powder #, Acidity Regulator (Potassium Carbonates)), Chocolate # (11 %) (Cocoa Mass #, Cane Sugar #, Cocoa Powder #, Vanilla Extract #), # = Certified Organic

FAQ

Which is healthier: Hot chocolatta white or Organic hot chocolate?

Overall, Organic hot chocolate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Organic hot chocolate has fewer calories: 384 kcal versus 389 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Organic hot chocolate has less sugar: 61 g versus 71 g per 100 g.

More comparisons