Hot chocolatta white vs Cola Cao
Overall, Cola Cao has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Hot chocolatta white | Cola Cao |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 389 kcal | 376 kcal |
| Fat | 3.2 g | 2.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.1 g | 1.5 g |
| Sugars | 71 g | 70 g |
| Salt | 0.6 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 8.1 g | 6.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cola Cao has 25% less fat (2.4 g vs 3.2 g).
- Cola Cao has 52% less saturated fat (1.5 g vs 3.1 g).
- Cola Cao has 76% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.6 g).
- Hot chocolatta white has 16% more protein (8.1 g vs 6.8 g).
- Only Hot chocolatta white lists: Gluten, Milk.
Ingredients
Hot chocolatta white
Захар, обезмаслено мляко на прах (22%), суроватка на прах, глюкозен сироп, напълно хидрогенирана кокосова мазнина, нишесте, ароматизанти, оцветител: каротени, стабилизатор:калиев фосфат
Cola Cao
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Hot chocolatta white or Cola Cao?
Overall, Cola Cao has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cola Cao has fewer calories: 376 kcal versus 389 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cola Cao has less sugar: 70 g versus 71 g per 100 g.