Comparison
Cola Cao vs Cola cao
Overall, Cola Cao has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cola Cao | Cola cao |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 376 kcal | 394 kcal |
| Fat | 2.4 g | 3.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.5 g | 1.6 g |
| Sugars | 70 g | 77 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.3 g |
| Protein | 6.8 g | 5.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cola Cao has 25% less fat (2.4 g vs 3.2 g).
- Cola Cao has 19% more protein (6.8 g vs 5.5 g).
Ingredients
Cola Cao
Not available.
Cola cao
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cola Cao or Cola cao?
Overall, Cola Cao has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cola Cao has fewer calories: 376 kcal versus 394 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cola Cao has less sugar: 70 g versus 77 g per 100 g.