Hold the cone Tips vs Chili Kirsche Schokolade
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Hold the cone Tips | Chili Kirsche Schokolade |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 500 kcal | 573 kcal |
| Fat | 23.3 g | 43 g |
| Saturated fat | 13.3 g | 27 g |
| Sugars | 36.7 g | 28 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 6.7 g | 11 g |
| Protein | 6.7 g | 6.9 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Soybeans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Hold the cone Tips has 13% fewer calories (500 kcal vs 573 kcal).
- Hold the cone Tips has 46% less fat (23.3 g vs 43 g).
- Hold the cone Tips has 51% less saturated fat (13.3 g vs 27 g).
- Chili Kirsche Schokolade has 24% less sugar (28 g vs 36.7 g).
- Chili Kirsche Schokolade has 39% more fiber (11 g vs 6.7 g).
- Chili Kirsche Schokolade is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Hold the cone Tips lists: Gluten, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Hold the cone Tips
Wheat flour, sugar, coconut oil, water, soy lecithin, salt, cocoa powder, unsweetened chocolate, cocoa butter.
Chili Kirsche Schokolade
Kakaomasse*, Rohrohrzucker*, Kakaobutter*, Sauerkirschcrisp* 3,5% (Sauerkirschpüree*, Apfelpüreekonzentrat*, Zitronensaftkonzentrat*, Sauerkirschsaftkonzentrat*), Chili* getrocknet 0,5% *aus biologischer Landwirtschaft. Kann Spuren von Gluten, Milch, Mandel, Haselnuss, Pecannuss und Pistazie enthalten.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Hold the cone Tips or Chili Kirsche Schokolade?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Hold the cone Tips has fewer calories: 500 kcal versus 573 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chili Kirsche Schokolade has less sugar: 28 g versus 36.7 g per 100 g.