Chocolat noir bio piment d'Espelette vs Chili Kirsche Schokolade
Overall, Chocolat noir bio piment d'Espelette has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Chocolat noir bio piment d'Espelette
Chili Kirsche Schokolade
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chocolat noir bio piment d'E... | Chili Kirsche Schokolade |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 571 kcal | 573 kcal |
| Fat | 43 g | 43 g |
| Saturated fat | 28 g | 27 g |
| Sugars | 28 g | 28 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 12.6 g | 11 g |
| Protein | 8.1 g | 6.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chocolat noir bio piment d'Espelette has 13% more fiber (12.6 g vs 11 g).
- Chocolat noir bio piment d'Espelette has 15% more protein (8.1 g vs 6.9 g).
Ingredients
Chocolat noir bio piment d'Espelette
Chocolat noir origine St-Domingue (masse de cacao, sucre de canne brut, beurre de cacao, poudre de cacao, poudre de vanille), piment d'EspeIette AOP 1%
Chili Kirsche Schokolade
Kakaomasse*, Rohrohrzucker*, Kakaobutter*, Sauerkirschcrisp* 3,5% (Sauerkirschpüree*, Apfelpüreekonzentrat*, Zitronensaftkonzentrat*, Sauerkirschsaftkonzentrat*), Chili* getrocknet 0,5% *aus biologischer Landwirtschaft. Kann Spuren von Gluten, Milch, Mandel, Haselnuss, Pecannuss und Pistazie enthalten.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chocolat noir bio piment d'Espelette or Chili Kirsche Schokolade?
Overall, Chocolat noir bio piment d'Espelette has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chocolat noir bio piment d'Espelette has fewer calories: 571 kcal versus 573 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chocolat noir bio piment d'Espelette has less sugar: 28 g versus 28 g per 100 g.