Comparison

Hipro Mousse cacao vs Mousse au chocolat à l'ancienne

Overall, Hipro Mousse cacao has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientHipro Mousse cacaoMousse au chocolat à l'ancie...
Nutri-Score a d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 85 kcal 356 kcal
Fat 2.3 g 25 g
Saturated fat 1.6 g 15 g
Sugars 4.3 g 20 g
Salt 0.3 g 0.3 g
Fiber — 5.4 g
Protein 10 g 8.3 g
Additives52
AllergensMilkEggs, Milk, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Hipro Mousse cacao has 76% fewer calories (85 kcal vs 356 kcal).
  • Hipro Mousse cacao has 91% less fat (2.3 g vs 25 g).
  • Hipro Mousse cacao has 89% less saturated fat (1.6 g vs 15 g).
  • Hipro Mousse cacao has 78% less sugar (4.3 g vs 20 g).
  • Hipro Mousse cacao has 17% more protein (10 g vs 8.3 g).
  • Hipro Mousse cacao has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Mousse au chocolat à l'ancienne lists: Eggs, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Hipro Mousse cacao

LAIT écrémé, LAIT entier, protéines de LAIT, poudre de cacao (4%), émulsifiant (esters lactiques des mono - et díglycérides d'acides gras), gélatine bovine, épaississant (amidon modifié), correcteur d'acidité (citrate de sodium), magnésium, édulcorant (sucralose), vitamine B9.

Mousse au chocolat à l'ancienne

Chocolat noir 42% (pâte de cacao, sucre, beurre de cacao, émulsifiant : lécithine de tournesol, arôme naturel de vanille), blancs d'œufs, jaunes d'œufs, beurre salé.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Hipro Mousse cacao or Mousse au chocolat à l'ancienne?

Overall, Hipro Mousse cacao has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Hipro Mousse cacao has fewer calories: 85 kcal versus 356 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Hipro Mousse cacao has less sugar: 4.3 g versus 20 g per 100 g.

More comparisons