Hipro Mousse cacao vs Mousse intense Chocolat noir
Overall, Hipro Mousse cacao has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Hipro Mousse cacao | Mousse intense Chocolat noir |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 85 kcal | 322 kcal |
| Fat | 2.3 g | 25 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.6 g | 16 g |
| Sugars | 4.3 g | 14 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | — | 3.3 g |
| Protein | 10 g | 6.9 g |
| Additives | 5 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Eggs, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Hipro Mousse cacao has 74% fewer calories (85 kcal vs 322 kcal).
- Hipro Mousse cacao has 91% less fat (2.3 g vs 25 g).
- Hipro Mousse cacao has 90% less saturated fat (1.6 g vs 16 g).
- Hipro Mousse cacao has 69% less sugar (4.3 g vs 14 g).
- Hipro Mousse cacao has 31% more protein (10 g vs 6.9 g).
- Hipro Mousse cacao has the better Nutri-Score.
- Mousse intense Chocolat noir is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Mousse intense Chocolat noir lists: Eggs.
Ingredients
Hipro Mousse cacao
LAIT écrémé, LAIT entier, protéines de LAIT, poudre de cacao (4%), émulsifiant (esters lactiques des mono - et díglycérides d'acides gras), gélatine bovine, épaississant (amidon modifié), correcteur d'acidité (citrate de sodium), magnésium, édulcorant (sucralose), vitamine B9.
Mousse intense Chocolat noir
CRÈME - chocolat noir 46,0% - sucre - sel, blanc d'OEUF 30%
FAQ
Which is healthier: Hipro Mousse cacao or Mousse intense Chocolat noir?
Overall, Hipro Mousse cacao has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Hipro Mousse cacao has fewer calories: 85 kcal versus 322 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Hipro Mousse cacao has less sugar: 4.3 g versus 14 g per 100 g.