Hickory BBQ vs Chips à l’ancienne
Overall, Chips à l’ancienne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Hickory BBQ
Chips à l’ancienne
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Hickory BBQ | Chips à l’ancienne |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 500 kcal | 543 kcal |
| Fat | 17.9 g | 33.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.8 g | 3 g |
| Sugars | 3.6 g | 0.2 g |
| Salt | 2.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 32.1 g | 0.9 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Hickory BBQ has 46% less fat (17.9 g vs 33.3 g).
- Hickory BBQ has 40% less saturated fat (1.8 g vs 3 g).
- Chips à l’ancienne has 94% less sugar (0.2 g vs 3.6 g).
- Chips à l’ancienne has 76% less salt (0.5 g vs 2.1 g).
- Hickory BBQ has 97% more protein (32.1 g vs 0.9 g).
- Chips à l’ancienne has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Hickory BBQ lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Hickory BBQ
Rice flour, pea protein isolate, tapioca starch, sunflower oil, rice protein isolate, sugar, corn maltodextrin, salt, brown sugar, paprika, yeast extract, spices, garlic powder, molasses, potassium salt, whey vinegar, natural flavors, onion powder, citric acid, paprika extract (color), vegetable juice (color), honey, canola oil, milk ingredients.
Chips à l’ancienne
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Hickory BBQ or Chips à l’ancienne?
Overall, Chips à l’ancienne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Hickory BBQ has fewer calories: 500 kcal versus 543 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chips à l’ancienne has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 3.6 g per 100 g.