Hazelnut Porter vs Banks's Exceptional Amber Bitter
Overall, Hazelnut Porter has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Hazelnut Porter
Banks's Exceptional Amber Bitter
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Hazelnut Porter | Banks's Exceptional Amber Bi... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 28 kcal | 33 kcal |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 1.9 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Milk, Hazelnut flavouring | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Hazelnut Porter has 16% fewer calories (28 kcal vs 33 kcal).
- Hazelnut Porter has 95% less sugar (0.1 g vs 1.9 g).
- Banks's Exceptional Amber Bitter is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Hazelnut Porter lists: Milk, Hazelnut flavouring.
Ingredients
Hazelnut Porter
Water, _barley_, lactose (_milk_), hops, yeast, _hazelnut flavouring_
Banks's Exceptional Amber Bitter
Water, Malted _Barley_, Brewing Syrup, Hops, Yeast
FAQ
Which is healthier: Hazelnut Porter or Banks's Exceptional Amber Bitter?
Overall, Hazelnut Porter has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Hazelnut Porter has fewer calories: 28 kcal versus 33 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Hazelnut Porter has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 1.9 g per 100 g.