Guinness Foreign Extra Stout vs Hazelnut Porter
Overall, Hazelnut Porter has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Guinness Foreign Extra Stout | Hazelnut Porter |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 60 kcal | 28 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten, Milk, Hazelnut flavouring |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Hazelnut Porter has 54% fewer calories (28 kcal vs 60 kcal).
- Hazelnut Porter has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Only Hazelnut Porter lists: Gluten, Milk, Hazelnut flavouring.
Ingredients
Guinness Foreign Extra Stout
Water Malted Barley Barley Roasted Barley Hops Yeast
Hazelnut Porter
Water, _barley_, lactose (_milk_), hops, yeast, _hazelnut flavouring_
FAQ
Which is healthier: Guinness Foreign Extra Stout or Hazelnut Porter?
Overall, Hazelnut Porter has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Hazelnut Porter has fewer calories: 28 kcal versus 60 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Guinness Foreign Extra Stout has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.1 g per 100 g.