Haricots bruns sauce Chili vs Haricots blancs à la sauce tomate
Overall, Haricots bruns sauce Chili has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Haricots bruns sauce Chili
Haricots blancs à la sauce tomate
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Haricots bruns sauce Chili | Haricots blancs à la sauce t... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 108 kcal | 81 kcal |
| Fat | 0.7 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 3.6 g | 4.4 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 5.7 g | 3.9 g |
| Protein | 5.6 g | 4.2 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Haricots blancs à la sauce tomate has 25% fewer calories (81 kcal vs 108 kcal).
- Haricots bruns sauce Chili has 18% less sugar (3.6 g vs 4.4 g).
- Haricots bruns sauce Chili has 32% more fiber (5.7 g vs 3.9 g).
- Haricots bruns sauce Chili has 25% more protein (5.6 g vs 4.2 g).
- Haricots bruns sauce Chili has the better Nutri-Score.
- Haricots blancs à la sauce tomate is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Haricots bruns sauce Chili
Haricots bruns (53 %), eau, purée de tomate double concentrée, sucre, épices (piments, cumin), sel, amidon modifié.
Haricots blancs à la sauce tomate
59,7 % haricots blancs, eau, 6,8 % purée de tomates, sucre de canne, sel marin, vinaigre, amidon.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Haricots bruns sauce Chili or Haricots blancs à la sauce tomate?
Overall, Haricots bruns sauce Chili has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Haricots blancs à la sauce tomate has fewer calories: 81 kcal versus 108 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Haricots bruns sauce Chili has less sugar: 3.6 g versus 4.4 g per 100 g.