Haribo Berries vs Nimm2 Lachgummi
Overall, Nimm2 Lachgummi has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Haribo Berries | Nimm2 Lachgummi |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 350 kcal | 332 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 70 g | 52.4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 1.1 g | 6.1 g |
| Additives | 2 | 5 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gelatin |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Nimm2 Lachgummi has 80% less fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Nimm2 Lachgummi has 25% less sugar (52.4 g vs 70 g).
- Nimm2 Lachgummi has 82% more protein (6.1 g vs 1.1 g).
- Only Nimm2 Lachgummi lists: Gelatin.
Ingredients
Haribo Berries
mga baya de one serving is equivalent to a small handful, contiene 7 porciones och jelly with nonpareille/ingredients: sugar, glucose syrup, gel gelling agent: agar-agar, acidifier: citric acid, elderberry flavouring, fruit and plant concentrates: blackcurrant, elderberry chokeberry, grape sunflower oil, colouring: biochar beeswax white and yellow,
Nimm2 Lachgummi
glucose syrup, sugar, gelatin, fruit juice (5%) from fruit juice concentrate (grape, elderberry), acidifier (citric acid, lactic acid), flavors, niacin, vitamin e, colouring concentrates (black carrot, spirulina), pantothenic acid, coloring turmeric extract, vitamin b6, biotin, vitamin b12, coating agent (carnauba wax, bee wax, white and yellow)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Haribo Berries or Nimm2 Lachgummi?
Overall, Nimm2 Lachgummi has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Nimm2 Lachgummi has fewer calories: 332 kcal versus 350 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Nimm2 Lachgummi has less sugar: 52.4 g versus 70 g per 100 g.