Hamburguesa pollo vs Hachés de Poulet Rôtis
Overall, Hachés de Poulet Rôtis has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Hamburguesa pollo | Hachés de Poulet Rôtis |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 172 kcal | 178 kcal |
| Fat | 9.4 g | 9.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.5 g | 3 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 1.2 g |
| Salt | 1.6 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 19.1 g | 18 g |
| Additives | 3 | 0 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Gluten, Milk | Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Hamburguesa pollo has 17% less saturated fat (2.5 g vs 3 g).
- Hamburguesa pollo has no sugar, while Hachés de Poulet Rôtis has 1.2 g.
- Hachés de Poulet Rôtis has 47% less salt (0.9 g vs 1.6 g).
- Hachés de Poulet Rôtis has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Hamburguesa pollo lists: Eggs, Gluten, Milk.
- Only Hachés de Poulet Rôtis lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Hamburguesa pollo
92% carne de pollo, pan rallado (harina de trigo, agua, sal, levadura), agua, sal, corrector de la acidez: acetatos de sodio; antioxidantes: lactato sódico, ascorbato sódico; especias. Puede contener trazas de soja, sulfitos, derivados de huevo y de la leche.
Hachés de Poulet Rôtis
Viande de filet poulet 70% (origine : france), eau, protéines de soja 8,8%, sirop de glucose, fécule de pomme de terre, arôme naturel de poivre avec autres arômes naturels, sel,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Hamburguesa pollo or Hachés de Poulet Rôtis?
Overall, Hachés de Poulet Rôtis has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Hamburguesa pollo has fewer calories: 172 kcal versus 178 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Hamburguesa pollo has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.2 g per 100 g.