Hamburguesa de cordero al romero vs Hamburguesa de Vaca Madurada
Overall, Hamburguesa de cordero al romero has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Hamburguesa de cordero al romero
Hamburguesa de Vaca Madurada
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Hamburguesa de cordero al ro... | Hamburguesa de Vaca Madurada |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 176 kcal | 250 kcal |
| Fat | 11.2 g | 20 g |
| Saturated fat | 5.1 g | 8.8 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | 1.1 g |
| Fiber | 0.1 g | — |
| Protein | 18.4 g | 17 g |
| Additives | 3 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Hamburguesa de cordero al romero has 30% fewer calories (176 kcal vs 250 kcal).
- Hamburguesa de cordero al romero has 44% less fat (11.2 g vs 20 g).
- Hamburguesa de cordero al romero has 42% less saturated fat (5.1 g vs 8.8 g).
- Hamburguesa de cordero al romero has 61% less salt (0.4 g vs 1.1 g).
- Hamburguesa de cordero al romero has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Hamburguesa de cordero al romero
Carne de cordero (98%), sal, dextrosa, especias, romero (0,2%), antioxidante (ascorbato sódico) y corrector de acidez (citrato trisódico).
Hamburguesa de Vaca Madurada
INGREDIENTES E Carne de vaca (98,5%), sal, antioxidantes (E-301 y E-331), aroma, especias y extractos vegetales. 301
FAQ
Which is healthier: Hamburguesa de cordero al romero or Hamburguesa de Vaca Madurada?
Overall, Hamburguesa de cordero al romero has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Hamburguesa de cordero al romero has fewer calories: 176 kcal versus 250 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Hamburguesa de cordero al romero has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.