Hamburger di pollo vs Hamburger di pollo
Overall, Hamburger di pollo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Hamburger di pollo | Hamburger di pollo |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 100 kcal | 135 kcal |
| Fat | 1.4 g | 5.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 2 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.4 g |
| Salt | 1.7 g | 0.3 g |
| Protein | 20 g | 21.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Hamburger di pollo has 26% fewer calories (100 kcal vs 135 kcal).
- Hamburger di pollo has 73% less fat (1.4 g vs 5.2 g).
- Hamburger di pollo has no saturated fat, while Hamburger di pollo has 2 g.
- Hamburger di pollo has no sugar, while Hamburger di pollo has 0.4 g.
- Hamburger di pollo has 84% less salt (0.3 g vs 1.7 g).
- Hamburger di pollo has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Hamburger di pollo
Not available.
Hamburger di pollo
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Hamburger di pollo or Hamburger di pollo?
Overall, Hamburger di pollo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Hamburger di pollo has fewer calories: 100 kcal versus 135 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Hamburger di pollo has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.4 g per 100 g.