Hamburger di pollo vs Hamburger di pollo biologico
Overall, Hamburger di pollo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Hamburger di pollo | Hamburger di pollo biologico |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 100 kcal | 117 kcal |
| Fat | 1.4 g | 3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.8 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.7 g | 1.6 g |
| Protein | 20 g | 19 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Hamburger di pollo has 15% fewer calories (100 kcal vs 117 kcal).
- Hamburger di pollo has 53% less fat (1.4 g vs 3 g).
- Hamburger di pollo has no saturated fat, while Hamburger di pollo biologico has 0.8 g.
Ingredients
Hamburger di pollo
Not available.
Hamburger di pollo biologico
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Hamburger di pollo or Hamburger di pollo biologico?
Overall, Hamburger di pollo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Hamburger di pollo has fewer calories: 100 kcal versus 117 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Hamburger di pollo has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.