Comparison

Hamburger di pollo vs Hamburger di pollo biologico

Overall, Hamburger di pollo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientHamburger di polloHamburger di pollo biologico
Nutri-Score b b
NOVA group — —
Calories 100 kcal 117 kcal
Fat 1.4 g 3 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0.8 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt 1.7 g 1.6 g
Protein 20 g 19 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Hamburger di pollo has 15% fewer calories (100 kcal vs 117 kcal).
  • Hamburger di pollo has 53% less fat (1.4 g vs 3 g).
  • Hamburger di pollo has no saturated fat, while Hamburger di pollo biologico has 0.8 g.

Ingredients

Hamburger di pollo

Not available.

Hamburger di pollo biologico

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Hamburger di pollo or Hamburger di pollo biologico?

Overall, Hamburger di pollo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Hamburger di pollo has fewer calories: 100 kcal versus 117 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Hamburger di pollo has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons