Hamburger con verdure , quinoa filetti di pollo vs Hamburger di pollo
Overall, Hamburger di pollo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Hamburger con verdure , quin... | Hamburger di pollo |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 164 kcal | 135 kcal |
| Fat | 7.7 g | 5.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.7 g | 2 g |
| Sugars | 1.1 g | 0.4 g |
| Salt | 1.6 g | 0.3 g |
| Protein | 11 g | 21.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Hamburger di pollo has 18% fewer calories (135 kcal vs 164 kcal).
- Hamburger di pollo has 33% less fat (5.2 g vs 7.7 g).
- Hamburger di pollo has 68% less sugar (0.4 g vs 1.1 g).
- Hamburger di pollo has 83% less salt (0.3 g vs 1.6 g).
- Hamburger di pollo has 49% more protein (21.6 g vs 11 g).
- Hamburger di pollo has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Hamburger con verdure , quinoa filetti di pollo
Not available.
Hamburger di pollo
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Hamburger con verdure , quinoa filetti di pollo or Hamburger di pollo?
Overall, Hamburger di pollo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Hamburger di pollo has fewer calories: 135 kcal versus 164 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Hamburger di pollo has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 1.1 g per 100 g.