Haché de Jambon - à Pôeler vs Hache porc
Overall, Haché de Jambon - à Pôeler has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Haché de Jambon - à Pôeler | Hache porc |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 136 kcal | 251 kcal |
| Fat | 6.3 g | 22 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.3 g | 8.3 g |
| Sugars | 1.3 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.5 g | 1.5 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 17 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Celery | None |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Haché de Jambon - à Pôeler has 46% fewer calories (136 kcal vs 251 kcal).
- Haché de Jambon - à Pôeler has 71% less fat (6.3 g vs 22 g).
- Haché de Jambon - à Pôeler has 72% less saturated fat (2.3 g vs 8.3 g).
- Hache porc has 62% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.3 g).
- Haché de Jambon - à Pôeler has 29% more protein (17 g vs 12 g).
- Haché de Jambon - à Pôeler has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Haché de Jambon - à Pôeler lists: Celery.
- Only Hache porc lists: None.
Ingredients
Haché de Jambon - à Pôeler
Jambon de porc 78%, eau, fécule de manioc, sel, extraits de levure, bouillons (eau, os de porc, viande de porc, plantes aromatiques, épices, _céleri_, jus concentré de _céleri_), dextrose de maïs, antioxydant : ascorbate de sodium, conservateur: nitrite de sodium.
Hache porc
Viande de porc 75%, eau, fibre de bambou 1,3%, sel, fibre de pois 0,8%, arômes naturels, farine de lin.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Haché de Jambon - à Pôeler or Hache porc?
Overall, Haché de Jambon - à Pôeler has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Haché de Jambon - à Pôeler has fewer calories: 136 kcal versus 251 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Hache porc has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.3 g per 100 g.