Comparison
Habas Iqf vs Apio Medialuna
Overall, Apio Medialuna has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Habas Iqf | Apio Medialuna |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 86 kcal | 16 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 1.8 g | 0.8 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 6.5 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 6.9 g | 0.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Celery |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Apio Medialuna has 81% fewer calories (16 kcal vs 86 kcal).
- Apio Medialuna has 60% less fat (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Apio Medialuna has no saturated fat, while Habas Iqf has 0.5 g.
- Apio Medialuna has 56% less sugar (0.8 g vs 1.8 g).
- Habas Iqf has 100% more fiber (6.5 g vs 0 g).
- Habas Iqf has 90% more protein (6.9 g vs 0.7 g).
- Only Apio Medialuna lists: Celery.
Ingredients
Habas Iqf
Not available.
Apio Medialuna
Apio.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Habas Iqf or Apio Medialuna?
Overall, Apio Medialuna has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Apio Medialuna has fewer calories: 16 kcal versus 86 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Apio Medialuna has less sugar: 0.8 g versus 1.8 g per 100 g.