Comparison
Guanciale vs Guanciale a cubetti
Overall, Guanciale a cubetti has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Guanciale | Guanciale a cubetti |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 676 kcal | 559 kcal |
| Fat | 70 g | 57 g |
| Saturated fat | 26 g | 21 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 3.5 g | 3 g |
| Protein | 11 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Guanciale a cubetti has 17% fewer calories (559 kcal vs 676 kcal).
- Guanciale a cubetti has 19% less fat (57 g vs 70 g).
- Guanciale a cubetti has 19% less saturated fat (21 g vs 26 g).
- Guanciale a cubetti has no sugar, while Guanciale has 0.5 g.
- Guanciale a cubetti has 14% less salt (3 g vs 3.5 g).
Ingredients
Guanciale
Not available.
Guanciale a cubetti
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Guanciale or Guanciale a cubetti?
Overall, Guanciale a cubetti has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Guanciale a cubetti has fewer calories: 559 kcal versus 676 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Guanciale a cubetti has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.