Comparison
Grimbergen Blonde vs Heineken
Overall, Heineken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Grimbergen Blonde | Heineken |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 54 kcal | 42 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.6 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Heineken has 22% fewer calories (42 kcal vs 54 kcal).
- Grimbergen Blonde has 100% more protein (0.6 g vs 0 g).
- Heineken is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Grimbergen Blonde
Eau, MALT D'ORGE, sirop de glucose, MALT DE BLE, caramel aromatique, extrait de houblon
Heineken
Eau, malt d'orge, extraits de houblon, alcool.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Grimbergen Blonde or Heineken?
Overall, Heineken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Heineken has fewer calories: 42 kcal versus 54 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Heineken has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.2 g per 100 g.