Comparison
Heineken vs Blonde
Overall, Heineken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Heineken | Blonde |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 42 kcal | 58 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Heineken has 28% fewer calories (42 kcal vs 58 kcal).
- Heineken has no sugar, while Blonde has 0.5 g.
- Blonde has 100% more protein (0.4 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Heineken
Eau, malt d'orge, extraits de houblon, alcool.
Blonde
Eau, malt d'orge, maïs, orge, sucre, houblon,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Heineken or Blonde?
Overall, Heineken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Heineken has fewer calories: 42 kcal versus 58 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Heineken has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.