Comparison
Grimbergen Blonde vs Timisoreana
Overall, Timisoreana has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Grimbergen Blonde | Timisoreana |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 54 kcal | 39 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.6 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Timisoreana has 28% fewer calories (39 kcal vs 54 kcal).
- Grimbergen Blonde has 100% more protein (0.6 g vs 0 g).
- Timisoreana is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Grimbergen Blonde
Eau, MALT D'ORGE, sirop de glucose, MALT DE BLE, caramel aromatique, extrait de houblon
Timisoreana
apă, malţ din orz, porumb, orz, hamei
FAQ
Which is healthier: Grimbergen Blonde or Timisoreana?
Overall, Timisoreana has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Timisoreana has fewer calories: 39 kcal versus 54 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Timisoreana has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.2 g per 100 g.