Comparison

Grießpudding Zimt vs Grießpudding High-Protein - Pur/Classic

Overall, Grießpudding Zimt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientGrießpudding ZimtGrießpudding High-Protein -...
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 84 kcal 81 kcal
Fat 1.5 g 1.5 g
Saturated fat 1 g 1 g
Sugars 4.7 g 4.6 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.1 g
Fiber 0.3 g 0 g
Protein 7.8 g 8 g
Additives33
AllergensGluten, MilkGluten, Milk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Grießpudding Zimt has 100% more fiber (0.3 g vs 0 g).

Ingredients

Grießpudding Zimt

55% protéines de lait, 38% lait entier (Origine : Pologne), 5,5% semoule de blé dur, amidon modifié de maïs, 0,2% cannelle, correcteur d'acidité: phosphates de sodium; édulcorants: acesulfame-K sucralose; arôme.

Grießpudding High-Protein - Pur/Classic

50% Milcheiweiß, Magermilch (pasteurisiert), 5,5% Hartweizengrieẞ, Sahne, modifizierte Stärke, natürliches Vanillearoma, Süßungsmittel Sucralose, Acesulfam K.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Grießpudding Zimt or Grießpudding High-Protein - Pur/Classic?

Overall, Grießpudding Zimt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Grießpudding High-Protein - Pur/Classic has fewer calories: 81 kcal versus 84 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Grießpudding High-Protein - Pur/Classic has less sugar: 4.6 g versus 4.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons