Green peas Koh-Kae vs Costes green peas wasabi flavour
Overall, Costes green peas wasabi flavour has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Green peas Koh-Kae | Costes green peas wasabi fla... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 516 kcal | 450 kcal |
| Fat | 26.8 g | 14 g |
| Saturated fat | 5.8 g | 3.5 g |
| Sugars | 13.6 g | 15 g |
| Salt | 1.4 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 9.4 g | — |
| Protein | 21.3 g | 16 g |
| Additives | 7 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Costes green peas wasabi flavour has 13% fewer calories (450 kcal vs 516 kcal).
- Costes green peas wasabi flavour has 48% less fat (14 g vs 26.8 g).
- Costes green peas wasabi flavour has 40% less saturated fat (3.5 g vs 5.8 g).
- Costes green peas wasabi flavour has 36% less salt (0.9 g vs 1.4 g).
- Green peas Koh-Kae has 25% more protein (21.3 g vs 16 g).
- Only Green peas Koh-Kae lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Green peas Koh-Kae
Petits pois 68%, amidon de tapioca modifiée 12%, farine de blé 8%, dont sucre 6%, arôme wasabi 3% (dont sucre, arôme wasabi, sel, glutamate monosodique, maltodextrine, poivron en poudre, dioxyde de silicium, huile de palme, sel, agent levant (E500, E503), édulcorant (E950), colorant (E141, E150c, E100)
Costes green peas wasabi flavour
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Green peas Koh-Kae or Costes green peas wasabi flavour?
Overall, Costes green peas wasabi flavour has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Costes green peas wasabi flavour has fewer calories: 450 kcal versus 516 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Green peas Koh-Kae has less sugar: 13.6 g versus 15 g per 100 g.