Comparison
Grant's vs 10 y. o. whisky 46%
Overall, 10 y. o. whisky 46% has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Grant's | 10 y. o. whisky 46% |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 63 kcal | 0 kcal |
| Fat | 2 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 2 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 2 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 2 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- 10 y. o. whisky 46% has no calories, while Grant's has 63 kcal.
- 10 y. o. whisky 46% has no fat, while Grant's has 2 g.
- 10 y. o. whisky 46% has no saturated fat, while Grant's has 2 g.
- 10 y. o. whisky 46% has 90% less sugar (0.1 g vs 1 g).
- 10 y. o. whisky 46% has no salt, while Grant's has 2 g.
- Grant's has 100% more protein (2 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Grant's
Not available.
10 y. o. whisky 46%
WHISKY
FAQ
Which is healthier: Grant's or 10 y. o. whisky 46%?
Overall, 10 y. o. whisky 46% has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
10 y. o. whisky 46% has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 63 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
10 y. o. whisky 46% has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 1 g per 100 g.