Comparison
William Peel vs Grant's
Overall, William Peel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | William Peel | Grant's |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 0 kcal | 63 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 2 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0 g | 2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- William Peel has no calories, while Grant's has 63 kcal.
- William Peel has no fat, while Grant's has 2 g.
- William Peel has no saturated fat, while Grant's has 2 g.
- William Peel has 90% less sugar (0.1 g vs 1 g).
- William Peel has no salt, while Grant's has 2 g.
- Grant's has 100% more protein (2 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
William Peel
Whisky
Grant's
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: William Peel or Grant's?
Overall, William Peel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
William Peel has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 63 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
William Peel has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 1 g per 100 g.