Glace au marron vs Marron mont blanc crème glacée
Overall, Glace au marron has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Glace au marron | Marron mont blanc crème glac... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 197 kcal | 222 kcal |
| Fat | 2.8 g | 9.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.9 g | 6 g |
| Sugars | 32 g | 27 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 1.3 g | 0.6 g |
| Protein | 3.4 g | 3.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Eggs, Gluten, Milk, Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Glace au marron has 11% fewer calories (197 kcal vs 222 kcal).
- Glace au marron has 71% less fat (2.8 g vs 9.8 g).
- Glace au marron has 68% less saturated fat (1.9 g vs 6 g).
- Marron mont blanc crème glacée has 16% less sugar (27 g vs 32 g).
- Glace au marron has 54% more fiber (1.3 g vs 0.6 g).
- Only Marron mont blanc crème glacée lists: Eggs, Gluten, Milk, Nuts.
Ingredients
Glace au marron
Not available.
Marron mont blanc crème glacée
_Lait_ écrémé réhydraté, _crème_ fraîche 22.3 %, crème de marron 22.3 % (purée de marron 11.4 %, sucre, poudre de vanille Bourbon), sucre, jaune d'_œuf_, _lait_ écrémé en poudre, blanc d'_œuf_, beurre de cacao, amidon de _blé_, extrait de vanille, grains de vanille, épaississant (farine de graine de caroube), colorant (caroténoïdes), concentrés végétaux (carotte, pomme).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Glace au marron or Marron mont blanc crème glacée?
Overall, Glace au marron has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Glace au marron has fewer calories: 197 kcal versus 222 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Marron mont blanc crème glacée has less sugar: 27 g versus 32 g per 100 g.