Comparison

Gerstenmalz extrakt vs Sirop de riz rijststroop

Overall, Gerstenmalz extrakt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientGerstenmalz extraktSirop de riz rijststroop
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 1 1
Calories 288 kcal 315 kcal
Fat 0.3 g 0.4 g
Saturated fat 0.2 g 0.1 g
Sugars 45 g 59.2 g
Salt 0 g 0.1 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 5 g 1.1 g
Additives00
AllergensGlutenNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Gerstenmalz extrakt has 24% less sugar (45 g vs 59.2 g).
  • Gerstenmalz extrakt has 78% more protein (5 g vs 1.1 g).
  • Only Gerstenmalz extrakt lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Gerstenmalz extrakt

_Gerstenmalz_, Wasser

Sirop de riz rijststroop

riz* rond, eau. ( * = issu de l'agriculture biologique). Sans gluten

FAQ

Which is healthier: Gerstenmalz extrakt or Sirop de riz rijststroop?

Overall, Gerstenmalz extrakt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Gerstenmalz extrakt has fewer calories: 288 kcal versus 315 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Gerstenmalz extrakt has less sugar: 45 g versus 59.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons