Gerstenmalz extrakt vs Sirop de riz rijststroop
Overall, Gerstenmalz extrakt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Gerstenmalz extrakt | Sirop de riz rijststroop |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 288 kcal | 315 kcal |
| Fat | 0.3 g | 0.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 45 g | 59.2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 5 g | 1.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Gerstenmalz extrakt has 24% less sugar (45 g vs 59.2 g).
- Gerstenmalz extrakt has 78% more protein (5 g vs 1.1 g).
- Only Gerstenmalz extrakt lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Gerstenmalz extrakt
_Gerstenmalz_, Wasser
Sirop de riz rijststroop
riz* rond, eau. ( * = issu de l'agriculture biologique). Sans gluten
FAQ
Which is healthier: Gerstenmalz extrakt or Sirop de riz rijststroop?
Overall, Gerstenmalz extrakt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Gerstenmalz extrakt has fewer calories: 288 kcal versus 315 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Gerstenmalz extrakt has less sugar: 45 g versus 59.2 g per 100 g.