Comparison

Genoa salami vs Salami wieprzowo-wołowe

Overall, Salami wieprzowo-wołowe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientGenoa salamiSalami wieprzowo-wołowe
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group — 4
Calories 393 kcal 391 kcal
Fat 33.9 g 33 g
Saturated fat 3.6 g 12 g
Sugars 3.6 g 2 g
Salt 4.2 g 3.2 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 19.6 g 21 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Genoa salami has 70% less saturated fat (3.6 g vs 12 g).
  • Salami wieprzowo-wołowe has 44% less sugar (2 g vs 3.6 g).
  • Salami wieprzowo-wołowe has 23% less salt (3.2 g vs 4.2 g).

Ingredients

Genoa salami

PORK DEXTROSE, LACTIC ACID SODIUM ASCORBATE, garlic powder

Salami wieprzowo-wołowe

Mięso wieprzowe, mięso wołowe, sól, dekstroza, przyprawy, ekstrakty przypraw, aromaty, cukier, tłuszcz wieprzowy, kultury starterowe.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Genoa salami or Salami wieprzowo-wołowe?

Overall, Salami wieprzowo-wołowe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Salami wieprzowo-wołowe has fewer calories: 391 kcal versus 393 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Salami wieprzowo-wołowe has less sugar: 2 g versus 3.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons