Comparison

Fusions strawberry, mango vs Melamangio mele essiccate

Overall, Melamangio mele essiccate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFusions strawberry, mangoMelamangio mele essiccate
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 331 kcal 355 kcal
Fat 1.4 g 0.4 g
Saturated fat 0.4 g 0.1 g
Sugars 61.3 g 78.6 g
Salt 0.5 g 0 g
Fiber 4.9 g 13 g
Protein 2.3 g 1.7 g
Additives10
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Melamangio mele essiccate has 69% less fat (0.4 g vs 1.4 g).
  • Melamangio mele essiccate has 85% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.4 g).
  • Fusions strawberry, mango has 22% less sugar (61.3 g vs 78.6 g).
  • Melamangio mele essiccate has 93% less salt (0 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Melamangio mele essiccate has 62% more fiber (13 g vs 4.9 g).
  • Fusions strawberry, mango has 25% more protein (2.3 g vs 1.7 g).

Ingredients

Fusions strawberry, mango

Dried Mango, Preservative: Sodium Metabisulphite, Flavouring.

Melamangio mele essiccate

Mele Golden Italiane essiccate.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Fusions strawberry, mango or Melamangio mele essiccate?

Overall, Melamangio mele essiccate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Fusions strawberry, mango has fewer calories: 331 kcal versus 355 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Fusions strawberry, mango has less sugar: 61.3 g versus 78.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons