Comparison
Fruits à croquer vs Mela Golden
Overall, Fruits à croquer has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fruits à croquer | Mela Golden |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 53 kcal | 53 kcal |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 11.3 g | 13.7 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.3 g | 0.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fruits à croquer has 18% less sugar (11.3 g vs 13.7 g).
Ingredients
Fruits à croquer
Not available.
Mela Golden
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fruits à croquer or Mela Golden?
Overall, Fruits à croquer has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fruits à croquer has fewer calories: 53 kcal versus 53 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fruits à croquer has less sugar: 11.3 g versus 13.7 g per 100 g.