Fruit Punch Sports Drink vs Locozade sport blue force
Overall, Locozade sport blue force has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fruit Punch Sports Drink | Locozade sport blue force |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 23 kcal | 27 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | — | 0 g |
| Sugars | 5.4 g | 3.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 3 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Locozade sport blue force has 35% less sugar (3.5 g vs 5.4 g).
- Locozade sport blue force has the better Nutri-Score.
- Fruit Punch Sports Drink is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Fruit Punch Sports Drink
filtered water, pure cane sugar, coconut water concentrate, citric acid, dipotassium phosphate, vegetable juice concentrate, ascorbic acid, magnesium oxide, niacinamide, calcium d-pantothenate, natural fruit punch flavor with other natural flavors, alpha-tocopheryl acetate, zinc oxide, pyridoxine hydrochloride, folic acid, vitamin a palmitate, cyanocobalamin
Locozade sport blue force
Water, Glucose Syrup, Acid (eic Acid Acidity Regulator (Sodium Citrate), Flavouring, Sweeteners (Acesulfame K, Sucralose), Stabilisers Acacia Gu Glycerol Esters of Wood Rosins Guar Gun), Niacin (Vitamin B3) Colour (Brilliant
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fruit Punch Sports Drink or Locozade sport blue force?
Overall, Locozade sport blue force has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fruit Punch Sports Drink has fewer calories: 23 kcal versus 27 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Locozade sport blue force has less sugar: 3.5 g versus 5.4 g per 100 g.