Fruchtaufstrich Williamsbirnen vs Obstwiese Birne
Overall, Fruchtaufstrich Williamsbirnen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fruchtaufstrich Williamsbirn... | Obstwiese Birne |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 211 kcal | 233 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 48 g | 55 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | — | 3.5 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.6 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fruchtaufstrich Williamsbirnen has no fat, while Obstwiese Birne has 0.5 g.
- Fruchtaufstrich Williamsbirnen has 13% less sugar (48 g vs 55 g).
- Obstwiese Birne has 100% more protein (0.6 g vs 0 g).
- Fruchtaufstrich Williamsbirnen has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Fruchtaufstrich Williamsbirnen
WILLIAMSBIRNEN (51%), FRUCHTSAFTKONZENTRATE (48%) (TRAUBEN-UND DATTEL - SAFTKONZENTRAT), GELIERMITTEL: PEKTIN, ZITRONENSAFT.
Obstwiese Birne
Birnen, Äpfel, Zucker, Geliermittel: Pektin
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fruchtaufstrich Williamsbirnen or Obstwiese Birne?
Overall, Fruchtaufstrich Williamsbirnen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fruchtaufstrich Williamsbirnen has fewer calories: 211 kcal versus 233 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fruchtaufstrich Williamsbirnen has less sugar: 48 g versus 55 g per 100 g.