Frites, Section De 6 mm vs Rustica
Overall, Frites, Section De 6 mm has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Frites, Section De 6 mm | Rustica |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 139 kcal | 503 kcal |
| Fat | 3.8 g | 27 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 9.4 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.6 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 1.1 g |
| Fiber | 2.3 g | 5.4 g |
| Protein | 2.3 g | 7.4 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Frites, Section De 6 mm has 72% fewer calories (139 kcal vs 503 kcal).
- Frites, Section De 6 mm has 86% less fat (3.8 g vs 27 g).
- Frites, Section De 6 mm has 96% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 9.4 g).
- Frites, Section De 6 mm has 91% less salt (0.1 g vs 1.1 g).
- Rustica has 57% more fiber (5.4 g vs 2.3 g).
- Rustica has 69% more protein (7.4 g vs 2.3 g).
- Frites, Section De 6 mm has the better Nutri-Score.
- Rustica is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Frites, Section De 6 mm
potatoes 96%, sunflower oil 4%, stabilizer: e450, dextrose,
Rustica
Patate, oli vegetali (palma, girasole alto oleico), sale. Può contenere latte, senape, soia e sedano.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Frites, Section De 6 mm or Rustica?
Overall, Frites, Section De 6 mm has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Frites, Section De 6 mm has fewer calories: 139 kcal versus 503 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Frites, Section De 6 mm has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.