Frites à la graisse de canard vs Mc Can Cote Resto
Overall, Mc Can Cote Resto has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Frites à la graisse de canar... | Mc Can Cote Resto |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 141 kcal | 148 kcal |
| Fat | 6.1 g | 4 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.1 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 0.7 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | 0.5 g |
| Fiber | 4 g | 4 g |
| Protein | 2.2 g | 3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Mc Can Cote Resto has 34% less fat (4 g vs 6.1 g).
- Mc Can Cote Resto has 81% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 2.1 g).
- Mc Can Cote Resto has 27% more protein (3 g vs 2.2 g).
- Mc Can Cote Resto has the better Nutri-Score.
- Frites à la graisse de canard is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Mc Can Cote Resto lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Frites à la graisse de canard
Pomme de terre 93%, graisse de canard 6%, ail, sel.
Mc Can Cote Resto
Pommes de terre (91,5 %), enrobage (4,5 % : farine de _blé_, farine de riz, amidon de maïs, dextrine de pommes de terre, sel, curcuma, colorant (extrait de paprika)), huile de tournesol,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Frites à la graisse de canard or Mc Can Cote Resto?
Overall, Mc Can Cote Resto has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Frites à la graisse de canard has fewer calories: 141 kcal versus 148 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Mc Can Cote Resto has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.