Frites à la graisse de canard vs Mc Can Cote Resto
Overall, Mc Can Cote Resto has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Frites à la graisse de canar... | Mc Can Cote Resto |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 224 kcal | 148 kcal |
| Fat | 10 g | 4 g |
| Saturated fat | 3 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Fiber | 4 g | 4 g |
| Protein | 3 g | 3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Mc Can Cote Resto has 34% fewer calories (148 kcal vs 224 kcal).
- Mc Can Cote Resto has 60% less fat (4 g vs 10 g).
- Mc Can Cote Resto has 87% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 3 g).
- Mc Can Cote Resto has the better Nutri-Score.
- Frites à la graisse de canard is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Mc Can Cote Resto lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Frites à la graisse de canard
Pomme de terre 88,6 %, graisse de canard 10,4 %,ail en poudre 0,5 %, sel.
Mc Can Cote Resto
Pommes de terre (91,5 %), enrobage (4,5 % : farine de _blé_, farine de riz, amidon de maïs, dextrine de pommes de terre, sel, curcuma, colorant (extrait de paprika)), huile de tournesol,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Frites à la graisse de canard or Mc Can Cote Resto?
Overall, Mc Can Cote Resto has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Mc Can Cote Resto has fewer calories: 148 kcal versus 224 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Frites à la graisse de canard has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.